The main difference
YiDa is a low-code product of Alibaba Cloud and has a large user base in the DingTalk ecosystem. Mingdao Cloud HAP is a completely neutral application platform that can connect with any collaborative platform. Even if customers switch collaborative platforms, HAP can still smoothly compatible.
In terms of product level, the main advantage of HAP compared to YiDa is the depth of data technology application, which enables HAP to carry a much higher load than SQL databases and has stronger Schema change capabilities. The professional version of YiDa can only support up to 600,000 rows of data per table, while HAP can do tens of times its capacity even without targeted optimization. The workflow of YiDa is still a traditional approval flow nature, unable to flexibly integrate with business automation capabilities, while HAP's automated workflow includes approval, fill-in and other manual transition processes, as well as a large number of automated data nodes, allowing users to build complex and powerful applications through HAP, which can also perfectly replace the cumbersome and difficult-to-learn BPM products.
In terms of deployment capabilities, HAP not only has an out-of-the-box SaaS model, but can also be deployed on any cloud computing platform through container technology. Both applications and data are completely controlled by customers. The exclusive version of YiDa is still actually on the Alibaba Cloud space managed by the vendor.
About Mingdao HAP Comparison
Writing a Competitor Comparison document is a challenge for any brand, and we face similar pressures.
Feature-by-feature comparison lists are usually ineffective because most mature products offer very similar features. What really distinguishes them, however, is the level of detail and depth of those features. However, delving into these details may turn the comparison into a technical document, but that still doesn't show the full picture. Ultimately, the best way to help users make a decision can only be through actual trials, and trial evaluations of enterprise-class products can be time-consuming and frustrating.
We also realize that no comparison chart created by a vendor can be completely objective. It's natural for vendors to highlight their strengths and downplay their weaknesses. While this is understandable, it doesn't help buyers much in making an informed decision.
Therefore, we have taken a different approach in this document. We start with a high-level positioning and an overview of the key features of each product, presenting a basic facts list. Next, we will open the document to existing customers, especially those who have transitioned from other products, inviting them to add comments and notes. Their insights will reveal the core differences between their previous solutions and Mingdao HAP.
We believe this approach will make product comparison information more informative and as objective as possible. Customers may not adopt the advantages described in this article about Mindray Cloud HAP by default, but by comparing the core differences, customers can get a general direction of selection, narrow down their choices, and in the final list, verify our advantageous statements through trial, and finally get a confident purchase choice.
